In the same interview, Karpathy says nanochat was not built by vibe coding

In the same interview, stated that nanochat was not built with vibe coding — saying coding models kept misunderstanding his custom implementation and suggesting deprecated APIs, and that he mostly uses autocomplete and limits vibe coding to boilerplate or unfamiliar languages

Why it matters

The coiner of the term publicly narrowed its scope. His own rebuttal to stretching vibe coding to cover production development

Source — Primary sources first; secondary reports are labelled “Press”

Pressdwarkesh.comhttps://www.dwarkesh.com/p/andrej-karpathy

Added in Week 35, 2026 · See that week

Same week

NVFP4 support requested in llama.cpp Discussion #16668OfficialKarpathy appears on Dwarkesh PodcastPressAnthropic launches Agent Skills (SKILL.md, progressive disclosure)OfficialPyTorch 2.9 releasedOfficial

Nearby on the same axis

Karpathy appears on Dwarkesh PodcastPressKarpathy releases nanochatOfficialSutton rejects the LLM path outright on Dwarkesh PodcastPressMoonshot AI's Yang Zhilin explains the open-source choice in a K2 Thinking AMAPress